Arthur & George

2015 •

In 1906, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, having lost his first wife, was overcome with grief; even Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson refused his call. It was only when his secretary, Woodie, presented him with an apparent real-life miscarriage of justice, that he could be roused to action. The case in question was that of George Edalji, a Parsee solicitor, who was imprisoned for writing obscene letters and killing livestock in Great Wyrley, Staffordshire. George needed Arthur's help to clear his name. However, as the twists and turns of the case unfold, Arthur himself questions George's innocence. It is only by finding the true culprit, that Arthur can finally put the case, and his grief, to rest; whilst simultaneously becoming influential in a major reform to the English judicial system.

Runtime: 2h 15m

Why you should read the novel

Julian Barnes’ novel Arthur & George is a masterful blend of historical fiction and detective mystery, immersing readers in late-Victorian England through a compelling narrative inspired by real events. The book delves deeply into the lives and inner worlds of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and George Edalji, offering perspectives, motivations, and social commentary far richer than what a screen adaptation can provide. By reading the novel, you can experience the subtle psychology and period atmosphere that Barnes evokes, tracing the intricacies of reputation, justice, and belief in ways that transcend the limitations of a two-hour film or mini-series.

Adaptation differences

The television adaptation of Arthur & George condenses the novel’s intricate psychological explorations and social context to fit the pacing and requirements of visual storytelling. The series tends to streamline George Edalji’s character arc, simplifying his background and the nuances of his quiet resilience against injustice. While the novel spends significant time developing the complex motivations and emotional landscapes of both Doyle and Edalji, the adaptation focuses more on plot progression and external events, sometimes at the expense of internal conflicts and subtle detail. Another notable difference lies in the treatment of the supporting characters, particularly Doyle’s personal life. Barnes’ novel offers introspective passages on Doyle’s relationship with his first wife and his later romantic entanglements, which shape his involvement in the Edalji case. In contrast, the adaptation abbreviates these relationships, opting for dramatic highlights over slow character development and omitting some key reflections that illuminate Doyle’s personal dilemma and moral trajectory. The book’s meticulous depiction of the English legal system’s shortcomings and the era's pervasive prejudices is more pronounced than in the adaptation, which, while touching on these issues, often frames them within direct conflict and investigation scenes. Barnes’ prose allows for a critique of institutional injustice that is both broader and subtler, giving readers time to inhabit the era’s oppressive atmosphere in a way the adaptation can only hint at through select dialogue and set pieces. Finally, the novel’s structure—alternating perspectives between Arthur and George—invites readers to engage deeply with each man’s voice, inner doubts, and evolving worldviews. The adaptation, constrained by running time and narrative clarity, chooses a more linear progression, sometimes losing the interplay of voices and the full impact of their eventual intersection in pursuit of dramatic momentum.