Death Wish

Brian Garfield's novel Death Wish delves far deeper into the psychological aftermath of violence than the film adaptation. The book vividly explores the internal transformation of a normal man grappling with immense loss and the moral implications of vigilantism, offering readers a richly textured perspective often glossed over on screen. Reading the original novel allows you to experience complex character development and nuanced social criticism. Garfield’s writing challenges readers to question the nature of justice, societal decay, and personal responsibility in ways that the action-focused movie cannot. It's a far more cerebral and morally ambiguous journey, provoking meaningful reflection and discussion. If you prefer thoughtful storytelling over adrenaline-fueled spectacle, the novel provides a slower, more immersive narrative. Instead of watching another Hollywood shoot-out, you’ll uncover the repercussions of violence and the toll revenge takes on the human soul—making for a far more memorable and thought-provoking experience.

One of the most significant differences between the Death Wish novel and its 2018 film adaptation lies in the main character’s background and motivation. In the book, Paul Benjamin is a middle-aged accountant, an everyman struggling with grief after his wife’s murder and daughter’s assault. The film reimagines him as Paul Kersey, a trauma surgeon played by Bruce Willis, who possesses more immediate skills for violent confrontation. This change shifts the tone from an ordinary individual confronting extraordinary horror to a more action-hero archetype. Garfield’s novel emphasizes the psychological descent of its protagonist. Paul's gradual obsession with revenge is portrayed as disturbing and tragic, highlighting the moral cost of vigilantism. The film, however, frames Kersey's actions in a more crowd-pleasing, action-oriented manner, often glorifying his vigilante spree. This change alters the narrative’s ambiguity, making the movie a straightforward revenge fantasy rather than a nuanced exploration of trauma. Another major difference is the setting and the social commentary of each version. The original novel is set in New York City during a period of urban decline and rising crime, making the story a direct critique of how fear and frustration can warp social norms. In contrast, the movie transplants the story to contemporary Chicago, focusing more on stylized violence and entertainment than a pointed societal critique, thus reducing the harder-hitting messages found in Garfield's writing. Lastly, the conclusion of the film is far more tidy and less thought-provoking than the book. Garfield ends his novel with lingering questions about justice, guilt, and what vengeance has done to Paul's soul. The 2018 film opts for a clearer resolution, allowing viewers to leave satisfied by the protagonist’s triumph rather than deeply unsettled by ambiguous morality.