One striking difference is focus: 'Cruella' (2021) is an origin story that zeroes in on young Estella/Cruella’s rise in the London fashion world, while Dodie Smith’s novel centers on Pongo and Missis, the Dalmatian couple, and their quest to rescue their puppies. The film reimagines Cruella with a tragic backstory and layers of emotional complexity that are entirely absent from the book, where she is simply a comically evil antagonist.

In the novel, Cruella de Vil is already an adult known for her bizarre, villainous love of fur and her flashy sense of style; she is not given any background or motivation for her eccentricities or her cruel desires. The movie, however, provides sympathetic motivations, focusing on her formative relationships and her rivalry with another fashion designer, which are inventions of the adaptation.

Characters also differ significantly. Many of the film’s supporting roles, such as Jasper and Horace as Cruella’s allies in crime and the formidable Baroness, do not correspond directly to anyone in the novel. In Smith’s book, the main characters are mostly the animals and their owners, with little exploration of human relationships outside simple archetypes.

Finally, the tone and message shift drastically. Dodie Smith’s novel is a lighthearted, family-friendly fantasy of good versus evil, starring clever, brave animals and their loving owners. The film, meanwhile, is edgier and more adult, playing with themes of identity, revenge, and ambition—it’s a dramatic reinvention rather than a direct adaptation.

Before the world knew Cruella as the captivating fashion villain from the movies, she first appeared in Dodie Smith’s delightful novel. The original book is rich with whimsical storytelling, charming animal characters, and a gentle sense of humor that makes it a timeless read for all ages.

By reading 'The Hundred and One Dalmatians,' you delve deeper into the personalities of both the dogs and humans, discovering nuances and motivations glossed over or changed in film adaptations. The novel feels like a magical journey through an English countryside brimming with imagination and heart.

Choosing the book lets you experience the true origins of Cruella, unfiltered and brilliantly developed in Smith’s original prose. You’ll find yourself rooting for the puppies in a story that focuses on courage and kindness just as much as adventure and suspense.

In 1970s London amidst the punk rock revolution, a young grifter named Estella is determined to make a name for herself with her designs. She befriends a pair of young thieves who appreciate her appetite for mischief, and together they are able to build a life for themselves on the London streets. One day, Estella’s flair for fashion catches the eye of the Baroness von Hellman, a fashion legend who is devastatingly chic and terrifyingly haute. But their relationship sets in motion a course of events and revelations that will cause Estella to embrace her wicked side and become the raucous, fashionable and revenge-bent Cruella.

Adventure

Crime

Comedy

The Hundred and One Dalmatians

Cruella

One major difference between the adaptation and the book is the omission of talking animals. In the novel, the dogs (and several other animals) speak and display remarkable intelligence, while the 1996 film presents the animals as silent, relying on action and physical comedy instead of dialogue. This shift makes the experience in the film more visually driven but loses much of the charm and depth of the animal characters’ personalities and relationships as written by Dodie Smith.

Another significant difference is in the depiction of the human characters, particularly Cruella de Vil. While Smith’s Cruella is eccentric and flamboyantly evil with a passion for fur, the movie exaggerates her personality even further, making her more of a slapstick villain whose antics often border on the absurd. The film’s comedic tone and exaggerated villainy contrast with the more satirical, nuanced approach taken in the book.

The setting and details of the plot are also altered. The original book takes readers through a magical, almost fairy-tale version of the English countryside, filled with memorable animal side characters and clever escapades. The film adaptation, while still set in England, trims several subplots and omits colorful secondary animal figures, streamlining the journey to focus on spectacle and visual action.

Lastly, the endings differ in tone and consequence. In the novel, the reunion and rescue of the puppies is a heartwarming culmination to a perilous journey, with thoughtful reflections on family and belonging. The movie, meanwhile, prioritizes slapstick and high-energy sequences, sometimes glossing over the deeper emotional bonds and quieter, magical moments that make the book so memorable.

If you’ve only watched the 101 Dalmatians movie, you’re missing out on the delightful, witty storytelling found in Dodie Smith’s original novel, The Hundred and One Dalmatians. The book immerses readers in a wonderful world viewed through the eyes of the dogs themselves, with richer character development and a deeper sense of canine perspective. Discover clever dialogue, gentle humor, and elements of fantasy only found in Smith’s enchanting prose that will ignite your imagination far beyond what’s possible on screen.

An evil, high-fashion designer plots to steal Dalmatian puppies in order to make an extravagant fur coat, but instead creates an extravagant mess.

Family

101 Dalmatians

One of the most notable differences between the film and Dodie Smith’s novel is the characterization of the Dalmatian parents. In the book, the couple is Pongo and Missis, while the movie changes Missis’s name to Perdita and merges the roles of two separate dogs into one character. This change affects both family dynamics and certain plot details, streamlining the parental figures and their relationship with the puppies.

Another significant difference is the way Cruella de Vil is portrayed. While both versions present her as flamboyant and villainous, the book delves more deeply into her background and motivations, revealing her marriage to a furrier and her passionate obsession with fur coats. The movie simplifies her characterization, focusing on her as a larger-than-life antagonist with a menacing, but more comedic, edge.

The rescue mission and journey of the puppies also differ notably. The original novel features a broader cast of canine helpers and additional obstacles faced by the protagonists, enriching the sense of a wider community of animals working together. The film adaptation trims or reimagines several episodes, emphasizing a faster-paced, visually engaging story suitable for its family audience.

Finally, many subplots—such as the fate of the abandoned dogs at Cruella’s neglected country house and the deeper exploration of animal communication—are either altered or omitted in the film. These narrative choices create a simpler, more streamlined story in the movie, but sacrifice some of the depth and subtlety found in Dodie Smith’s original work.

If you’ve only experienced One Hundred and One Dalmatians through its animated adaptation, you’re missing out on the rich storytelling and nuanced world Dodie Smith creates in her beloved novel. The book invites readers into an imaginative and vividly detailed version of England, where canine heroes embark on a harrowing journey that’s both thrilling and heartwarming. Smith’s clever wit, memorable characters, and evocative descriptions give readers a more immersive and personal connection to Pongo, Missis, and their puppies.

Reading the novel offers an opportunity to experience the full depth of doggy camaraderie, bravery, and family underlining the tale, as well as the distinctive personalities of each pup. The written form also highlights the unique voices and perspectives of the canine protagonists, a feature that often gets glossed over in visual adaptations.

Moreover, Dodie Smith’s original story contains subtle themes and charming subplots omitted from the film, providing richer context and greater emotional stakes. If you want to truly appreciate the origin of this iconic story, experiencing the novel firsthand will bring you closer to the heart of the Dalmatians’ adventure and Dodie Smith’s enduring imagination.

When a litter of dalmatian puppies are abducted by the minions of Cruella De Vil, the parents must find them before she uses them for a diabolical fashion statement.

Animation

One Hundred and One Dalmatians

The 2003 movie adaptation of I Capture the Castle captures the essence of Dodie Smith's beloved novel but inevitably condenses and alters key elements. While the film offers stunning visuals and strong performances, it omits several nuanced details and secondary plotlines present in the book. As a result, some of the depth and complexity of the original story is lost in translation.

One significant difference is the portrayal of Cassandra's personal growth and her relationships with other characters. In the novel, Cassandra's internal monologue and detailed diary entries provide readers with a profound understanding of her emotional journey. The film, limited by its medium, cannot fully convey the subtleties of Cassandra's introspection or the motivations driving her family members.

Another notable adaptation difference lies in the pacing and resolution of key events. The book unfolds at a leisurely pace, allowing ample time for the development of each character and subplot. The movie, on the other hand, streamlines the narrative, often leaving out important interactions and moments that deepen the story's impact in the original novel. This results in a more simplified and sometimes rushed finale compared to the book's reflective ending.

Finally, characters such as Rose, Topaz, and even Mr. Mortmain are given more dimensionality and backstory in Dodie Smith's writing. The film must condense or overlook these elements for time, offering viewers only a glimpse of the rich personalities and relationships that make the novel so memorable. For a truly immersive experience, reading I Capture the Castle delivers a fuller understanding of the characters and their enchanting world.

If you were captivated by the 2003 film adaptation of I Capture the Castle, you owe it to yourself to experience Dodie Smith's original novel. The book offers a richly detailed narrative, allowing readers deeper insight into Cassandra Mortmain's world and inner thoughts. Reading the novel brings you closer to the intimate and lyrical storytelling that only literature can provide, elevating the coming-of-age tale beyond its film interpretation.

Unlike watching a movie, reading I Capture the Castle immerses you in 1930s England with evocative prose and Smith's signature wit. Through Cassandra's journal entries, every emotion, secret longing, and eccentric family dynamic becomes more vivid and real. The novel explores themes of love, ambition, and identity in a depth that a two-hour movie simply cannot match.

By choosing the book over the film, readers gain access to the full tapestry of characters and setting that Dodie Smith carefully crafted. Whether you're a fan of literary classics or new to this enchanting story, the novel promises a rewarding journey filled with humor, heartbreak, and the timeless desire to capture the fleeting moments of youth.

In 1930s England, 17-year-old Cassandra Mortmain and her eccentric family struggle to survive in a decaying English castle.

I Capture the Castle

Why you should read the novel

Adaptation differences