The Thursday Murder Club

Richard Osman's The Thursday Murder Club sparkles with the kind of dry wit and nuanced character development that only a novel can sustain. Through the eyes of four pensioners-turned-amateur-detectives, readers are invited into the intimate and funny world of Cooper’s Chase, a setting that springs to vivid life on the page. The book's narrative deftly twines rich backstories with contemporary mysteries, creating an immersive experience that film adaptations often struggle to replicate. In the novel, Osman's careful pacing and skillful use of multiple points of view allow readers to savor each twist and uncover the characters’ hidden depths. The humor is as much in the narration as in the dialogue, reliant on the kind of direct engagement between author and reader that’s inherently literary. This makes for a personal reading adventure, where every revelation and every joke lands with maximum effect. Choosing to read the book over watching the movie gives you access to Osman's voice: his playful asides, his subtle commentary on aging, and the underlying warmth he brings to his characters. Every clue, every moment of reflection, is enriched in print—making the journey as rewarding as the final solution.

The movie adaptation of The Thursday Murder Club streamlines several complex plotlines from the book in order to fit the standard film runtime. This means certain subplots and character arcs, particularly those involving the personal histories of Joyce and Ibrahim, are either condensed or omitted entirely. As a result, the movie trades some of the book’s depth for pacing, focusing more tightly on the main murder mystery. Characterization is also fundamentally different between book and screen. Richard Osman’s novel grants each of the club’s members a distinct voice through alternating chapters. This narrative style allows their inner thoughts, motivations, and quirks to shine, offering a richer understanding of their personalities. The film, limited by its visual medium, leans more on performances and dialogue, often relying on shorthand to convey traits that are deeply explored in the novel. Another notable difference is the portrayal of humor and ambience. The book’s warmth and sardonic commentary are as much a product of Osman’s writing style as the events themselves. In adapting to film, much of this tone is translated through actors’ delivery and visual gags, sometimes missing the subtlety of the original prose. Not every clever aside or dry observation makes it to the screen. Finally, fans of the book will notice that the film’s ending is slightly altered for cinematic effect. Minor plot points are resolved differently, and some character relationships are developed more fully or left ambiguous compared to the novel. While the spirit of the story remains intact, these changes can shift the emotional impact and message, giving viewers and readers distinctly unique experiences.