Wildlife

2018 • Drama • PG-13

14-year-old Joe is the only child of Jeanette and Jerry — a housewife and a golf pro — in a small town in 1960s Montana. Nearby, an uncontrolled forest fire rages close to the Canadian border, and when Jerry loses his job (and his sense of purpose) he decides to join the cause of fighting the fire, leaving his wife and son to fend for themselves.

Runtime: 1h 45m

Why you should read the novel

Rediscover the powerful story behind the movie by reading Richard Ford's acclaimed novel, Wildlife. The book offers a deeper, more nuanced exploration into the lives of a family unraveling amidst personal and environmental crises. By immersing yourself in the source material, you'll experience the finely crafted prose and internal perspectives that only Ford can deliver. For readers who crave authentic emotional depth and a masterful rendering of 1960s small-town America, reading Wildlife provides insights that the movie adaptation merely hints at.

Adaptation differences

One of the main differences between the Wildlife film adaptation and Richard Ford's novel lies in the narrative perspective. While the movie visually interprets the story, offering cinematic representations of key moments, the novel is told from the first-person viewpoint of the teenage son, Joe. This subtle switch results in a greater psychological depth and insight into Joe's internal struggles, something that is less pronounced in the film. Another distinction is how nuanced motivations and emotional rawness are explored. The novel delves more deeply into the characters’ thoughts and complexities, especially those of Joe’s parents, making their choices appear more layered and ambiguous. In contrast, the movie adaptation sometimes simplifies these dynamics for cinematic clarity and pacing, potentially reducing the moral ambiguity present in the book. Settings and era details are also differently handled. Richard Ford's writing offers richly detailed descriptions of the Montana setting and the social atmosphere of the early 1960s, immersing readers in time and place. While the film reproduces these visually, it cannot replicate the precise observations and emotional resonance that Ford brings to his literary landscape. Finally, the ending undergoes a subtle shift in tone and resolution. The book leaves readers with a sense of lingering uncertainty about the family's future and the lasting impacts on young Joe. The movie, though faithful in many respects, offers interpretations that may feel more conclusive or visually symbolic. This means that the novel's open-ended, contemplative finish is somewhat softened in the cinematic retelling.