Devotion, a Story of Love and Desire

Marco Missiroli’s novel Fidelity explores the depths of human desire, trust, and infidelity with exquisite psychological insight and profound tenderness. Unlike typical stories of betrayal, the book grants readers intimate access to its characters’ inner worlds, making their doubts and hopes achingly real. The careful prose and narrative focus invite you to re-examine concepts of loyalty and passion beyond what is possible on screen. The novel allows for a slower, more contemplative experience, providing layers of subtext and emotion that a television adaptation may only hint at. Through its pages, readers uncover the subtle shift in relationships and the intricacies of silence, doubt, and reconciliation. You are not just a spectator; you are drawn into the emotional labyrinth of the protagonists. Reading Fidelity is a far richer encounter than watching the adaptation, as the novel’s introspective voice and multifaceted characterization encourage you to pause, reflect, and connect deeply with each nuance. The poetry and raw authenticity of Missiroli’s writing offer a lasting impression long after the final page.

The Netflix series Devotion, a Story of Love and Desire, while inspired by Missiroli’s Fidelity, makes several notable changes to suit the visual medium and episodic narrative. The show amplifies the visual allure of Milan, focusing more on glamorous settings and stylized scenes, which sometimes distracts from the book’s inward psychological journey. Whereas the novel relies heavily on internal monologues and subtle cues, the series translates these into explicit dialogue or visual shorthand, occasionally sacrificing depth for pace. Characterization is another area where the adaptation diverges. The motivations and backgrounds of Carlo and Margherita are streamlined, at times simplifying their internal struggles or reworking their dynamics to fit the episodic format. Side characters, too, are given different amounts of screen time and development to heighten drama or create cliffhangers at the end of episodes. The series also compresses or omits several subplots found in the book, such as more nuanced explorations of secondary relationships and Margherita’s deepening interior life, in favor of a tighter central narrative. As a result, the adaptation moves at a faster rhythm, trading the book’s reflective mood for a sense of mounting suspense and immediacy. Perhaps most strikingly, the ending of the series departs in tone and interpretation from the novel’s more ambiguous conclusion. Where Missiroli’s original leaves readers with lingering questions about faithfulness and desire, the series tends toward resolution, shaping the story to provide clearer answers for its audience. This shift fundamentally changes the impact and meaning of the original work.