
Shardlake
2024 • Drama, Mystery • TV-14
The year is 1536. Lawyer Matthew Shardlake finds his life turned upside down when Thomas Cromwell sends him to investigate a suspicious death at the remote monastery of Scarnsea. Deception, deceit, and corruption are rife as it soon becomes clear that the murder is not the first. Shardlake is drawn into a web of lies that threatens not only his integrity but his life.
Why you should read the novel
While the TV adaptation brings Tudor England to life with visual flair, the original novels by C. J. Sansom offer a much deeper and more immersive experience. The books masterfully weave intricate plots with fascinating historical details and the nuanced, introspective voice of Matthew Shardlake, something only the written word can truly capture. Readers are drawn directly into Shardlake’s personal struggles, thoughts, and emotions, which foster a richer connection than what the screen can provide.
C. J. Sansom’s writing immerses you in the complexities of the Reformation and the religious turmoil of 16th-century England. The novels bring secondary characters to life, build tension through carefully constructed mysteries, and reward those who appreciate atmospheric world-building and thoughtful pacing. If you enjoy unraveling mysteries alongside a deeply engaging protagonist, the books are an essential read.
Discovering Shardlake’s world on the page allows you to engage with the historical and moral complexities at your own pace, savoring the author’s meticulous research and elegant prose. By reading the novels, you not only enjoy a compelling mystery but also gain a fuller, more nuanced understanding of the turbulent times and the characters who inhabit them.
Adaptation differences
The TV adaptation of Shardlake takes notable liberties with the narrative structure and pacing of the original novel, prioritizing suspense and visual impact over the slow-burn tension crafted by C. J. Sansom. Key plot points and revelations are sometimes shifted or condensed to fit the episodic format, which can simplify or omit the subtle intricacies of character motivation and historical context present in the book.
Another major difference is the portrayal of Matthew Shardlake himself. While the series presents him as intelligent and dogged, it often tones down some of his internal struggles and insecurities, which are central to Sansom’s literary characterization. The first-person narrative from the novel, which deeply explores Shardlake’s thoughts and personal challenges as a hunchbacked lawyer in Tudor England, is inherently difficult to translate fully to the screen.
Several supporting characters are given either expanded or reduced roles in the adaptation. Some secondary figures are amalgamated, omitted, or have their backstories altered to streamline the storyline for television. This can make the world of the series feel less expansive and detailed compared to the rich tapestry created in the book, where even minor characters contribute significantly to the atmosphere and plot.
Finally, thematic elements such as religious turmoil, the nuances of the English Reformation, and the day-to-day struggles of living in Tudor England are sometimes simplified or visualized in a way that can detract from the books’ historical depth. The adaptation usually highlights action and intrigue, while the novel invests just as much in the era’s social, legal, and philosophical complexities. As a result, those interested in Tudor history and moral ambiguity will find greater satisfaction in the source novels.
Shardlake inspired from
Dissolution
by C. J. Sansom