The Best Thing

Choosing to read The Best Thing by Mia Sheridan grants you intimate access to the protagonist’s deepest thoughts, emotions, and memories—elements that no TV adaptation can fully capture. Sheridan’s evocative writing style draws you directly into the nuances of love, loss, and healing, immersing you in an emotional journey that’s both authentic and heartwarming. The novel delves into the complexities of family dynamics, forgiveness, and personal courage, all presented through beautifully crafted prose. You’ll savor not only the main plot but the rich internal conflicts and character development that unfold at a pace perfect for reflection. Let yourself be moved by the raw, unfiltered perspectives that only the original book delivers. If you’re searching for a profound, multilayered experience that lingers beyond the final page, reading the source novel of The Best Thing is—ironically—the best thing you can do.

One of the most noticeable differences between the TV adaptation and the book is the treatment of narration and perspective. While the novel unfolds primarily through an intimate first-person lens, the series employs a broader, multi-character perspective, often shifting the focus away from the protagonist’s inner world. This approach changes how viewers connect with the core themes of vulnerability and resilience presented in the original work. The TV adaptation also alters the storyline to fit episodic structure, introducing new subplots and secondary characters not found in Mia Sheridan’s novel. These additions are designed to create suspense and maintain viewer engagement week after week, sometimes at the cost of the subtlety and slow-burn romance that define the book. Characterization is another key area where the show diverges. Certain characters’ backstories and motivations are condensed or modified, streamlining their arcs to fit within the series’ limited screen time. This can result in relationships that feel rushed or less authentic compared to the novel’s careful, gradual exploration of their complexity. Finally, the tone and atmosphere differ between the two mediums. The show, while visually appealing, occasionally sacrifices the novel’s contemplative, quietly powerful moments for faster pacing and more overt drama. Fans of Sheridan’s writing may miss the gentle, introspective scenes that give the original story its lasting emotional impact.