The Scarlet Letter

1979 • Drama

The Scarlet Letter is a 1979 miniseries based on the novel of the same name that aired on WGBH from March 3, 1979 to March 24, 1979. The series is four episodes long, 60 minutes each. Part 2 won the 1979 Emmy Award for Outstanding Video Tape Editing for a Limited Series or Special for film editors Ken Denisoff, Janet McFadden, and Tucker Wiard. In 1979, when most literary programs were being produced in the United Kingdom, Boston public television station WGBH decided to produce a homegrown literary classic of its own. The result is this epic version of Nathaniel Hawthorne's enduring novel of Puritan America in search of its soul. Hester Prynne overcomes the stigma of adultery to emerge as the first great heroine in American literature. Hawthorne's themes, the nature of sin, social hypocrisy, and community repression, still reverberate through American society. Meg Foster brings a quiet strength to the role of Hester, the adulteress condemned to wear a scarlet "A" for the rest of her life. As her partner in crime, the Reverend Arthur Dimmesdale, John Heard writhes in private torment most convincingly. Kevin Conway completes this grim triangle as the mysterious, maleficent Roger Chillingworth. The costumes and scenery are simple, so as not to detract from the dialogue as each character grapples with the meaning of sin, forgiveness, and redemption.

Why you should read the novel

Nathaniel Hawthorne’s novel The Scarlet Letter is a profound exploration of sin, guilt, and redemption set in Puritan New England. Its lush prose and evocative symbolism create a hauntingly beautiful literary experience that goes beyond the visual storytelling of the television adaptation. Reading the novel allows you to immerse yourself in Hester Prynne’s inner world, understand her motivations, and witness the complex tapestry of social and spiritual dynamics shaping her fate. The richness of Hawthorne’s language, filled with detailed descriptions and psychological depth, rewards readers with insights that cannot be fully captured on screen. Symbolism, such as the scarlet letter 'A' itself, and the changing perception of Hester in her community are layered in the narrative, offering multiple interpretations and a thought-provoking reading experience. The book invites personal reflection and empathy, growing deeper with each reading. Furthermore, The Scarlet Letter’s place in the canon of American literature makes it an essential read for anyone interested in the roots of America’s cultural and moral foundations. It challenges modern readers to consider the meaning of justice, the nature of public shame, and the possibility of redemption, all within prose that is as memorable as the dramatic story it unfolds.

Adaptation differences

One major difference between the 1979 TV series and Hawthorne’s novel is the condensation of the narrative. The series, aiming for a concise visual story, omits much of the internal monologue and reflection that defines Hester's and Dimmesdale’s journeys in the book. As a result, viewers might miss the nuanced psychological landscapes and moral dilemmas that Hawthorne so carefully constructs in his text. Character development is another area where the adaptation diverges. On screen, certain characters, such as Roger Chillingworth and Pearl, are simplified for narrative clarity and pacing. Chillingworth's complex motivations and Pearl's symbolic significance—both essential to understanding the novel’s deeper themes—are not explored with the same depth, potentially flattening their roles. Visual storytelling in the series naturally focuses on external drama, occasions, and dialogue, often at the expense of Hawthorne’s dense symbolism and style. The importance of the scaffold scenes or the relationship between the natural world and society is suggested visually but lacks the interpretive ambiguity and introspective passages present in the book. Lastly, themes of sin, redemption, and social hypocrisy are more explicitly depicted in the television adaptation, sometimes prioritizing accessible storytelling over nuance. Hawthorne’s narrative leaves readers to grapple with ambiguity and moral complexity, prompting them to question their own values—a subtlety that may be lost when watching the adaptation instead of reading the original novel.