Who Were We Running From?

Reading Perihan Mağden’s 'Who Were We Running From?' offers a deeply personal and nuanced psychological journey that only prose can capture. The novel allows you to immerse yourself in the mother’s fractured perspective, exploring intricate emotions and dark motivations that are often only hinted at on screen. Through Mağden’s evocative language, every moment of tension, paranoia, and maternal devotion feels immediate and vividly real. The novel crafts an atmosphere of claustrophobia and fear by letting you inhabit the characters’ inner turmoil. As a reader, you gain direct access to their thoughts, memories, and justifications, which offers a more profound understanding of their relationship and the world they perceive as hostile. This intimacy not only builds suspense, but also empathy, challenging you to wrestle with difficult questions of love, loyalty, and trauma. By choosing the book over the series, you’re rewarded with the author’s original vision: a literary tale rich in symbolism, psychology, and subtle social commentary. Mağden’s storytelling presents cultural context and character nuances that television adaptation may simplify or alter, making the reading experience indispensable for those craving depth and authenticity.

The TV series adaptation of 'Who Were We Running From?' introduces several key changes from Perihan Mağden's novel, beginning with the narrative structure. While the novel is primarily told from the daughter's perspective and employs a more fragmented, internal style, the series often shifts focus to the mother, blending both viewpoints and providing an external look at their journey. This change alters the tone and shifts some emotional weight from introspection to action-oriented suspense, making for a brisker pace but sometimes at the expense of psychological depth. Another significant difference lies in character portrayal. The novel carefully constructs the mother as an enigma, revealing her traumas and background through ambiguous memories and the daughter's unreliable narration. The show, on the other hand, gives viewers more explicit information about the mother's past and her interactions with the outside world, making her motivations clearer but arguably less mysterious and layered than in the book. The series also introduces new supporting characters and expands on episodic encounters that are only briefly touched upon in the source material. In doing so, it adds subplots and dramatizes events to sustain episodic tension, sometimes diverging from the novel’s minimalist, almost claustrophobic setting that keeps the focus tightly on the mother-daughter relationship. While this enhances the show’s action and suspense, it can dilute the emotional intensity and literary subtlety that define the book. Finally, the ending and thematic emphasis are handled differently. Where Mağden’s novel leaves several questions unanswered and leans into ambiguity and open-ended tragedy, the series provides more resolution and closure, aligning with conventional television storytelling. These differences make for distinct experiences: the novel prioritizes psychological complexity and atmosphere, while the series opts for clarity, action, and accessibility.