The American Friend

Patricia Highsmith's 'Ripley's Game' delves deep into the complex psychology of its leading characters, offering a far richer understanding of their motives and moral ambiguity than any screen adaptation can capture. Her writing draws readers into a world of subtle menace and intricate plots, exploring themes of crime, loyalty, and personal transformation with chilling intimacy. By reading the novel, you'll experience not just a brilliantly paced thriller, but also Highsmith's lucid and unnerving prose, which grips you from the first page and never lets go.

Wim Wenders’ adaptation, 'The American Friend,' diverges in significant ways from Patricia Highsmith’s original novel, ‘Ripley’s Game.’ First, the film shifts the setting and atmosphere, moving the story primarily to Hamburg and subtly altering cultural contexts, whereas the book’s plot unfolds in various European locations, including France and Italy. This geographical shift changes the flavor and psychological landscape of the story, infusing it with Wenders' signature German existential melancholy. Secondly, the characterization of Tom Ripley in the film is markedly different. In Highsmith’s novel, Ripley is cold, calculating, and distinctly refined in his manipulations, while Wenders’ version, portrayed by Dennis Hopper, is more enigmatic, bohemian, and emotionally unstable, which influences the story’s tone and the audience’s perception of Ripley’s actions. Another significant difference is the narrative’s structure and its focus. While the novel concentrates on the psychological evolution and moral dilemmas of Jonathan, the picture frays these edges by immersing itself in style, ambiance, and the relationships rather than following the book’s tightly woven suspense and inner dialogue. The film also combines material from Highsmith’s earlier Ripley novel, ‘Ripley’s Game,’ and elements from ‘Ripley Under Ground,’ introducing hybridized scenes and character motivations. Finally, the film’s ending is more ambiguous and resolutely open-ended compared to the book’s more conclusive and measured closure. Highsmith dots the novel’s final pages with clear consequences for the characters’ actions, whereas Wenders prefers to leave emotional and narrative threads unresolved, encouraging viewers to interpret the aftermath for themselves.