Action

Adventure

Animation

Comedy

Crime

Drama

Family

Fantasy

History

Horror

Music

Mystery

Romance

Science Fiction

Thriller

TV Movie

Western

One of the most notable differences between the 2020 film adaptation and the original novel is the change in setting and context. Döblin’s 'Berlin Alexanderplatz' unfolds in the fraught cultural milieu of late 1920s Berlin, while director Burhan Qurbani’s film transposes the narrative to contemporary Berlin, immersing the story in modern immigrant experiences and reshaping key cultural references.

Another significant change lies in the characterization of Franz Biberkopf. In the novel, Franz is an ex-convict of German origin navigating the treacherous landscape of post-World War I Germany. The film, however, reimagines Franz as Francis, an undocumented refugee from West Africa. This shift not only changes the character’s background but also infuses the story with urgent relevance to present-day migration issues.

The storytelling style is also markedly different. Döblin utilizes a fragmented, stream-of-consciousness approach, blending dialogue, omniscient narration, and external sources like advertisements and song lyrics. The film streamlines the narrative for clarity, relying on visual invention and voiceover while necessarily reducing the polyphonic, experimental texture that typifies the novel.

Lastly, the film adaptation alters certain plot points and relationships to update social dynamics and make the story resonate for modern audiences. Themes of racism, institutional obstacles, and questions of identity and belonging are amplified, shifting the focus away from the specific historical-political critique of Weimar Germany found in the book. These creative choices distinguish the adaptation from its literary source, resulting in a compelling but fundamentally different interpretation.

Alfred Döblin's 'Berlin Alexanderplatz' is a pioneering masterpiece that immerses readers in the chaotic pulse of Weimar-era Berlin. Through its experimental narrative, Döblin offers a psychological portrait that captures the hopes, fears, and struggles of Franz Biberkopf with raw immediacy. The novel’s unique collage of inner monologues, street sounds, and newspaper clippings provides a literary experience far richer and more textured than any screen adaptation could convey.

Reading Döblin’s novel means engaging directly with a world teeming with life as it was experienced in late 1920s Berlin. The novel’s complexity allows you to savor both its social commentary and the revolutionary style—a must for any lover of serious literature. You’ll witness how Franz’s tragic journey unfolds with nuance and ambiguity, shaped by the dark urban forces and fleeting moments of grace.

Rather than passively watching a director’s interpretation, reading the book invites you to inhabit the protagonist’s mind and the city’s soul. Döblin’s language, wit, and historical richness ensure a deeply personal encounter that will linger long after the last page—an experience that simply can’t be replicated by film.

In 2015, thirty year old refugee Francis, the sole survivor of a boat that illegally crossed the Mediterranean, is drawn into Berlin's seedy underbelly.

Berlin Alexanderplatz

One of the most striking differences lies in how the movie simplifies or omits several key subplots and side characters from Jenny Han’s novel. The book spends more time developing Lara Jean’s friendships, particularly her close bond with Stormy at Belleview, the retirement home, giving extra depth to Lara Jean’s personal growth; in contrast, the film reduces or merges these moments for brevity.

Another notable change is the portrayal of John Ambrose’s character and the love triangle dynamic. In the book, John Ambrose is portrayed as more of a sincere, emotionally significant contender for Lara Jean’s affection, and their friendship is more heartfelt and layered. The movie, due to time constraints, presents their relationship in a more compressed and slightly less impactful way, making Peter’s presence more dominant throughout.

Certain plot points, such as the game of Assassins at Belleview, are given more complexity and importance in the novel, serving as clever metaphors for Lara Jean’s inner conflicts. The adaptation streamlines these scenes to focus on romantic tension, rather than the camaraderie and personal stakes emphasized in the book.

Finally, the book’s exploration of family dynamics, especially between Lara Jean and her sisters, is richer and more detailed on the page. The film adapts these relationships in a visually touching manner but loses some of the intricate emotion and dialogue from the book, offering a more simplified, cinematic view of Lara Jean’s world.

Delve into Jenny Han’s original novel, P.S. I Still Love You, and step beyond the bright lens of its film adaptation. The book offers a richer, deeper insight into Lara Jean’s thoughts and the nuances of her relationships that often get lost on screen. Page by page, readers can engage with her inner world, the written subtleties of her hopes, fears, and longing that only literature can fully convey.

By choosing the book over the movie, you’ll discover new layers to beloved characters like John Ambrose and Peter, getting access to their motivations and emotional landscapes. Subplots and minor characters, sometimes trimmed or changed for pacing in the adaptation, are given proper time to grow and impact the journey of Lara Jean in the novel. Jenny Han’s evocative, heartfelt writing elevates every moment, making it truly memorable.

Reading the source novel connects you directly with the author’s original story, unfiltered by the necessities of filmmaking. You’ll develop a stronger bond with Lara Jean’s candid voice, mature alongside her through every conflicted decision, and cherish the authenticity of Jenny Han’s storytelling. The book invites you to fall in love with the world of To All the Boys in a way only the page allows.

Lara Jean and Peter have just taken their romance from pretend to officially real when another recipient of one of her love letters enters the picture.

P.S. I Still Love You

To All the Boys: P.S. I Still Love You

One of the most notable differences between The Turning and The Turn of the Screw is the setting and time period. While James’s original novella is set in Victorian England, steeped in 19th-century social customs and sensibilities, the film adaptation updates the story to 1994 New England. This shift modernizes the narrative but also alters the atmospheric tension that is so integral to the book’s psychological horror.

The characterization also diverges between the two mediums. In the novella, the governess is a complex, unreliable narrator whose inner turmoil and possible descent into madness drive the ambiguity of the story. The film, instead, externalizes much of her anxiety through overt supernatural events and visual scares, reducing the sense of subjectivity and leaving less to the viewer’s interpretation. The children, Flora and Miles, are also given more explicit supernatural behavior in the movie, whereas in the book their innocence and possible complicity remain tantalizingly vague.

Another significant difference is the treatment of ambiguity. James’s narrative is renowned for its open-endedness, never confirming whether the ghosts are real or figments of the governess’s imagination. The Turning, while still aiming for ambiguity, leans more on horror conventions and visual manifestations, making its supernatural elements more concrete. The film’s controversial ending, which plunges into a surreal, ambiguous sequence, has been criticized for confusion rather than the sustained psychological suspense the original achieved.

Finally, The Turning introduces several new story elements and character backgrounds, such as a contemporary trauma experienced by the governess, Kate, and a backstory for her mother. These additions aim to give context and modern relevance but are not present in Henry James’s spare, subtle novella. By adding these plotlines, the film loses some of the elegant, ominous restraint that defines the original work, ultimately reshaping the central mystery and haunting power that have made The Turn of the Screw a classic for over a century.

When you read Henry James’s The Turn of the Screw, you’re invited into a rich, suspenseful tapestry of psychological horror that has intrigued readers for generations. The novella’s ambiguous storytelling and unreliable narration create a spine-chilling experience that far surpasses any cinematic version, allowing your imagination to wander through the shadowy halls of Bly and question every eerie encounter. Every turn of the page leaves you grappling with unsettling mysteries, unsure whether the supernatural events are real or figments of a disturbed mind.

Choosing the book over the film gives you access to James’s masterful prose and the complex inner world of the governess, whose perception shapes the entire story. Readers become detectives, deciphering her motives and sanity in a way that film adaptations rarely capture. The Victorian setting, with its intricate social and psychological nuances, unfolds in subtle layers—inviting endless speculation and debate about what truly haunts Bly.

Beyond its ghostly themes, The Turn of the Screw offers a profound meditation on innocence, repression, and the power of suggestion. It’s a literary experience filled with tension and uncertainty, granting each reader a unique, unrepeatable fright. Rather than passively watching scares unfold, the book fully immerses you in the disturbing world James so hauntingly crafted, making it an essential read for anyone drawn to gothic horror.

A young woman quits her teaching job to be a private tutor for two wealthy young kids, but soon starts to suspect there’s more to their house than what meets the eye.

Categories

Movies by Year

Movies

Berlin Alexanderplatz

To All the Boys: P.S. I Still Love You

The Turning